The concern about the reproducibility of published results is growing in the scientific community. Pharmacological Research has thus implemented an author checklist in order to help the authors to increase the overall quality of the articles they publish with us and ensure better transparency and reproducibility of their results. The author checklist can be downloaded at Author checklist
Existing ranking systems typically focus on single fields (e.g., ranking of authors in economics is performed by ) and use numbers of papers and total citations rather than multiple metrics. They also do not account for self-citation phenomena. Nevertheless, our databases still have limitations that have been discussed in detail previously in describing the methodology behind the composite indicator [2]. We should also caution again that citations from before 1996 are missing from our analysis. Overall, whole-career metrics place young scientists at a disadvantage. Single-year metrics remove much of this problem, although again, younger scientists have fewer years of publication history and thus probably fewer papers that can be cited in 2017. We have included the year of first (earliest) publication and the year of last (more recent) indexed publication of each author.
Multi Author Pharmacology Pdf Download
The PubMed Format tags table defines the data tags that compose the PubMed format. The tags are presented in alphabetical order. Some of the tags (e.g., CIN) are not mandatory and therefore will not be found in every record. Other tags (e.g., AU, MH, and RN) may occur multiple times in one record. You can download records in PubMed format as a text file (.txt) or as an .nbib file for exporting into citation management software programs.
That said, we understand that, for some studies, particularly for interdisciplinary ones, multiple authors may bear the responsibilities of a corresponding author. If you feel strongly and have compelling reasons, you may include additional corresponding authors. We may ask you to explain your rationale and to verify that all corresponding authors understand their responsibilities (listed below). We ask that you describe each corresponding author's specific contributions in the author contributions section.
Lead contact: The lead contact is the corresponding author who is also responsible for communicating with the journal (before and after publication) and conveying any relevant information or updates to co-authors and is accountable for fulfilling requests for reagents and resources and for arbitrating decisions and disputes. For research papers with multiple corresponding authors, please designate one (and only one) corresponding author as the lead contact. If there is only one corresponding author, then that author is automatically also the lead contact. You should denote the lead contact with a footnote in the author list (e.g., "5Lead contact").
Starting in January 2021, we will require authors to fill out an inclusion and diversity form. This is a new initiative at Cell Press designed to give authors a mechanism to document inclusion and diversity information that is relevant to their paper and the option to showcase it in the paper itself by adding a dedicated inclusion and diversity statement. The concept underlying this initiative is similar to existing statements about declarations of interests, author contributions, and data and code availability but focuses on highlighting aspects of the paper that are relevant for inclusion and diversity. It is purposely multifunctional and designed to give authors a venue to express ways in which their work, their research group, or both are contributing to help science become a more inclusive and diverse enterprise overall.
In human research, the term "sex" carries multiple definitions. It often refers to an umbrella term for a set of biological attributes associated with physical and physiological features (e.g., chromosomal genotype, hormonal levels, or internal and external anatomy). It can also signify a sex categorization, most often designated at birth ("sex assigned at birth") based on a newborn's visible external anatomy. The term "gender" generally refers to socially constructed roles, behaviors, and identities of women, men, and gender-diverse people that occur in a historical and cultural context and might vary across societies and over time. Gender influences how people view themselves and each other, how they behave and interact, and how power is distributed in society. Sex and gender are often incorrectly portrayed as binary (female or male; woman or man), concordant, and static. However, these constructs exist along a spectrum that includes additional sex categorizations and gender identities, such as people who are intersex/have differences of sex development (DSD) or identify as non-binary. In any given person, sex and gender might not align, and both can change. Sex and gender are not entirely discrete concepts, and their definitions continue to evolve. Biology and society influence both, and many languages do not distinguish between them. Since the terms "sex" and "gender" can be ambiguous, authors should describe the methods they use to gather and report sex- and/or gender-related data (e.g., self or physician report, specific biological attributes, current sex or gender, sex assigned at birth, etc.) and discuss the potential limitations of those methods. This will enhance the research's precision, rigor, and reproducibility and help to avoid ambiguity or conflation of terms and the constructs to which they refer. Authors should use the term "sex assigned at birth" rather than "biological sex," "birth sex," or "natal sex," as it is more accurate and inclusive. When asking about gender and sex, researchers should use a two-step process: (1) ask for gender identity allowing for multiple options and (2) if relevant to the research question, ask for sex assigned at birth. In addition to this defining guidance and the SAGER guidelines, you can find further information about reporting sex and gender in research studies in Elsevier's diversity, equity, and inclusion in publishing author guide available here.
The lead contact statement must identify and provide contact information for the lead contact, who is the main point of contact for responding to material and resource requests. While manuscripts may have multiple corresponding authors and senior authors, they must have only one lead contact.
We recommend uploading your manuscript and other related files individually. By submitting your manuscript as a Word file, it may allow for Editorial Manager to automatically identify and extract the title, author list and affiliations, and abstract of your paper, helping to ease the submission process. Alternatively, for initial submissions, you can upload your paper as a single combined PDF. In doing this, you can intersperse the figures and figure legends within the results section to aid evaluation of your paper. In either case, Editorial Manager will build a composite PDF of submitted files for editorial and reviewer consideration. This composite PDF will contain links that editors and reviewers can use to download individual high-resolution files (for figures which have been submitted in JPEG, TIFF, or EPS format). The version of the composite PDF that is shared with reviewers will not include a cover letter or any reviewer preferences. We require that the composite PDF is kept below 20MB to ease editorial and reviewer consideration.
Similarity Check is a multi-publisher initiative to screen published and submitted content for originality using iThenticate software. ASPET uses Similarity Check to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts. All manuscripts considered for publication will be screened using Similarity Check and iThenticate prior to acceptance. Visit Similarity Check for more information. Plagiarism will be reported to the authors' institution(s) and funder(s).
12. Authorship Contributions. Each author must be identified with at least one of the following contribution categories only from the list below. List the applicable author contribution categories followed by the last name and 1st initial of each author (use first and middle initials when multiple authors share a last name). For example:
Videos should be submitted in QuickTime 3.0 or higher format and may be prepared on either a PC or Mac computer. All videos should be submitted at the desired reproduction size and length. The legend must be included as a separate file. To avoid excessive delays in downloading the files, videos must be no more than 5 MB in size and 30 to 60 seconds in length. Authors are encouraged to use QuickTime's "compress" option when preparing files to help control file size. Additionally, cropping frames and image sizes can significantly reduce file sizes. Files submitted can be looped to play more than once, provided file size does not become excessive. Authors will be notified if problems exist with videos as submitted and will be asked to modify them. No editing will be done to the videos at the editorial office. All changes are the responsibility of the author. 2ff7e9595c
Comments